500 RPM baseline
66.67 Hz · 15.39 V phase RMS · 26.65 V star line RMS. Compare the line voltage with your converter range before requesting a winding design.
Screen open-circuit phase voltage, line voltage and frequency for a dual-rotor, single-stator design. Free, instant and no sign-up. Continuous power requires a separate load and thermal analysis.
Use the calculatorCalculation notes updated ·
| Quantity | Equation and assumption |
|---|---|
| Frequency | f = P × RPM / 120; P is poles per rotor. |
| Active area | A = π × (Do² − Di²) / 4, with diameters in metres. |
| Flux per pole | Φ = (2/π) × Bpeak × A / P. Ideal sinusoidal field, uniform radially; leakage and pole-arc effects not separately modeled. |
| Phase RMS EMF | E = √2 × π × f × N × kw × Φ (about 4.44 × f × N × kw × Φ), kw = 0.95. |
| Line RMS voltage | Balanced star: √3 × E. Delta: E. Open-circuit AC, not rectified DC. |
Both use 16 poles, 300/200 mm active diameters, 0.7 T peak field and 50 series turns per phase. These are illustrative inputs, not product specifications.
66.67 Hz · 15.39 V phase RMS · 26.65 V star line RMS. Compare the line voltage with your converter range before requesting a winding design.
13.33 Hz · 3.08 V phase RMS · 5.33 V star line RMS. Voltage falls with speed; increasing series turns also changes resistance and available current.
The assumed winding factor is kw=0.95. Actual winding factor depends on coil pitch, distribution and harmonic order; derive it from the winding layout before using the voltage estimate.
No continuous power rating is inferred. Specify conductor size, current, winding resistance, losses, cooling and duty cycle, then verify temperatures under load.
Dual-rotor architectures experience intense magnetic attraction between rotors. Deflection must be carefully analyzed to maintain a consistent airgap under operating loads.
How is the output voltage calculated?
Ephase = √2 × π × f × N × kw × Φ, with kw=0.95. This is the sinusoidal open-circuit RMS EMF, not terminal voltage under load. Flux per pole comes from the ideal annulus model shown below.
Why does changing poles leave voltage unchanged here?
In this model, frequency grows with pole count while flux per pole falls by the same factor. Voltage stays constant at fixed RPM, geometry, field and series turns. Real designs can also change leakage, winding factor and losses.
Can this tool establish rated power?
No. A kW rating requires load current, power factor or rectifier behavior, losses and thermal validation. Ask engineering for a loaded voltage-speed curve and continuous-duty test results.
Why choose a dual-rotor configuration?
Two magnet rotors face a central stator. Symmetry may balance net stator axial force, but individual rotors still carry magnetic attraction loads. Check rotor deflection, bearings and air-gap tolerances.
Coreless vs. Cored Stator?
A coreless stator removes stator iron loss and tooth-related cogging, but winding, rotor and mechanical losses remain. A cored design changes the flux path and requires saturation and core-loss analysis. This tool does not select either design.
Do I double poles, flux or turns for two rotors?
No. Enter poles per rotor and actual series turns per phase. Enter the peak fundamental field of the assembled magnetic circuit. This single-stator model counts linked flux once; it does not add two independent generators.
Which voltage should I compare with a converter?
Compare like-for-like specifications: star line RMS voltage is √3 times phase RMS; delta line RMS equals phase RMS. DC after rectification depends on load, capacitance, conduction and diode drops and is not calculated here.
Is the magnet remanence Br the correct flux input?
No. Use the peak sinusoidal fundamental in the working air gap from measurement or magnetic analysis. Magnet remanence is a material property; gap length, leakage and the magnetic circuit affect the working field.
Are my inputs uploaded or stored?
Calculation, copying and text export run in your browser without login or AI. The RFQ button opens a draft in your email application; review it before sending.
Published by AFPM Motor. Examples are reproducible calculations, not measured prototype performance or customer test results. Sources checked September 19, 2026. The annulus integration and fixed winding factor are this tool’s screening assumptions, not validated manufacturer data.
| Source | Use on This Page |
|---|---|
| Sathyabama University — Electrical Machine Design, SEE1304 (PDF) | PDF pages 47–48: AC-machine frequency, EMF, winding factor and electrical loading. Supports the base equations, not a validated rating for this topology. |
| MIT OpenCourseWare — 6.685, Permanent Magnet Machines (2013, PDF) | Pages 9–10 distinguish magnet remanence and magnetic-circuit operating conditions. Does not validate the assumed kw=0.95 or a continuous power rating. |
Estimate performance for 4-phase (orthogonal) axial flux generators.
Review generator options and the inputs needed for an engineering inquiry.
Estimate performance for coreless axial flux generators.
Explore low-speed axial flux generator screening.
Plan the evidence needed to verify a prototype under load.
Send the open-circuit estimate, target loaded voltage, rotor OD limit, axial length, and cooling method so engineering can screen whether a dual-rotor AFPM generator is the right architecture.
Inquiry Email
Please include application, peak/continuous torque, speed range, voltage/current limit, outer diameter, axial length, cooling method, quantity, and drawings or reference samples.
Instant Chat
+86 188 5797 1991
Share torque-speed, package, cooling, and sample quantity in the first message.